Fire Testing
of
Communications Cables
in
Plenums
Presented by: Loren Caudill, DuPont, to
the International Fire Safety Conference in San Francisco in 1996.
Sponsored by: The Society of Plastics Industries,
Inc.
Participating Companies: AT&T Bell Laboratories,
Ausimont, Daikin, DuPont, Elf Atochem, and Solvay Polymers
In response to increased specified activity relating
to fire testing of wire and cable with the international community, a
study was conducted at the Building Research Establishment / Fire Research
Station in Cardington, UK by the Fluoropolymers Division of The Society
of the Plastics Industries to investigate and compare the fire performance
of a range of communications cables installed in concealed (plenum) spaces.
These horizontal spaces include the area above a suspended ceiling and
under a raised floor.
CONCERN ABOUT BUILDUP OF COMBUSTIBLES
IN CONCEALED SPACES (PLENUMS)
The rapid growth of computers on local area networks
(LAN) and the complete replacement of cables approximately every 2-3 years
has led to a concern about the accumulation of combustibles in these spaces.
These concealed spaces can provide a path for fire and smoke to spread
undetected throughout a building.
All the cable /trunking conditions tested in this
study would be acceptable under current UK guidelines. Only the CMP cable
and the CMX cable in trunking would be acceptable in the US. The results
of this study demonstrate the different levels of performance between
UK and US practices. Of the cables tested without trunking, only CMP
cable has performance equivalent to CMX in trunking.
The need for an International Fire Test Standard
for communication cable installations is being studied by IEC SC20C (flammability
of wire and cable) and data from this work will provide guidance.
A Test Program was developed utilizing full-scale
and intermediate scale testing. The cables tested were 4 pair UTP (unshielded
twisted pair) communication cables. There were 200 lengths of cable used
per test. This represents one generation of cable in a typical open-plan
office installation.
FULL SCALE TESTING
For the full scale testing, a reburnable test rig
was constructed at the Building Research Establishment / Fire Research
Station in Cardington, UK This facility was chosen because of its capability
and reputation as one of the premier fire testing laboratories in the
world.
- The test rig consisted of a concrete block
building with external dimensions of 7.37 meters in length by 5.7 meters
wide. The height of the rig was 4 meters with a drop ceiling forming
a concealed space 1 meter deep.
- Two extract systems were fitted: a low volume
extract system exhausting into a small 150 mm diameter duct, and a high
volume extract system, having a speed controlled extract system having
an extract rate up to 4.5 cubic meters/sec exhausted into a large duct
760 mm in diameter. Both fans (one on each duct) were of the
bifurcated type. For this study, the small duct was blocked off so that
all flow was through the large duct
- Cables were supported on steel ladder 7.2 meters
long by 380mm wide. The ladders were installed in the center of the
concealed space through an opening in the end of the wall.
- A high fire performance (2 hour endurance)
ceiling was installed with a breach arrangement directly over the fire
source. The fire source consisted of kiln dried pinus sylvestris with
approximately 20% moisture content and stored in a conditioned room
until used. The average crib stick dimensions were 60mm by 60mm by l
meter. A total of 100 sticks were used to generate a 1 megawatt fire.
- All cables were stored in a conditioning room
at 23 degrees centigrade and 50% relative humidity for a minimum of
10 days.
- Thermocouples (30-40 per test) were placed
throughout the burn room in the concealed space and in the exhaust duct.
This allowed for vertical and horizontal mapping of the temperatures
and served as a means to determine flame spread along the ladder in
the concealed spaces.
- Gas Sampling for O2, CO, C02was
used for calculating the heat release rates and determining the type
and stage of the fire.
- Smoke and velocity measurements were taken
in the exhaust duct.
- For calibration purposes, an insulated board
was placed on the ladder and thermocouples were Installed along the
board to obtain a background profile without combustibles.
- Videos of the burn room and the concealed space
were recorded for each test Also still photos were taken every 1 minute.
These provided the visual analysis of the burn tests.
- All data was collected electronically every
10 seconds for on-line real time monitoring and the data was stored
in a spreadsheet format.
INTERMEDIATE SCALE TESTING
For the intermediate testing, the NFPA 262 Steiner
tunnel was modified to measure heat release and smoke release rates. Other
than these modifications, the standard test protocol was followed.
Cable Description
The products tested consisted of the following commercially
obtained cables and trunking.
- CMX - PVC / PE
- CMX - PVC / PE in trunking
- LSF - Low Smoke / Fume Non-Halogen
- CMP - Fluoropolymers
Test Protocols
The CMX cable was tested installed in capped rectangular
metal trunking as used in the UK as well as exposed without protection.
All other cables were tested exposed.
CMX in metal conduit is the requirement in the
National Electrical Code in the United States and was the benchmark for
the CMP cables that are allowed now.
TEST RESULTS
| Flame
Propagation |
| Cable |
Full-Scale (meters) |
NFPA 262 (ft.) |
CMX/Trunking
(PVC/PE) |
0 |
0.5
1.0 |
CMX
Exposed
(PVC/PE)
|
7 |
19.5
19.5 |
LSF
Exposed
(Low smoke/fume non-halogen)
|
7 |
19.5 |
CMP
Exposed
(Fluoropolymers) |
0 |
1.0
2.0
|

|
Smoke
Measurements
|
Cable
ID
|
Full Scale |
NFPA 262 |
| Max
Optical Density |
Peak Optical Density |
| CMX
Trunking |
0.5 |
0.03
0.07 |
| CMX
Exposed |
0.16 |
2.00
2.00 |
| LSF
Exposed |
0.31 |
0.48
|
|
Total
Heat Release Measurements
|
|
Cable
ID
|
Full-Scale |
NFPA 262 |
| CMX/Trunking |
13 |
109
109 |
| CMX
Exposed |
610 |
241
234 |
| LSF
Exposed |
457 |
248
244 |
| CMP
Exposed |
68 |
141
119 |
| Relative
Ranking |
|
|
Flame
Propagation |
Smoke Generation |
Total
Heat Released |
| CMX/Trunking |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| CMP
Exposed |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| LSF
Exposed |
4 |
2 |
4 |
| CMX
Exposed |
4 |
4 |
4 |
CONCLUSIONS
- Of the exposed cables tested, only exposed
CMP (fluoropolymer) cable showed fire performance comparable to CMX
(PVC/PE) cable in cable in metal trunking.
- The Steiner tunnel test (NFPA 262) correlates
well with full scale results from Building Research Establishment/Fire
Research Station.
The Author
Loren M. Caudill is a Programs Development Manager
with DuPont Fluoropolymers of E. I duPont de Nemours, Inc, Wilmington, DE.
Tel: 302.999.2430, Fax: 302.999.4932; loren.m.caudill@usa.dupont.com
|